plastic mold shrinkage rate

plastic mold shrinkage rate


Plastic Material Shrinkage Rates

Each product design needs to know the plastic material shrinkage rate. So that when he designs his parts, he can present the correct scale size of the drawing to the mold manufacturing factory.
Plastic molding shrinkage is the contraction of plastic moulding as it cools after injection. Most shrinkage occurs in the mould during cooling, but some shrinkage occurs after ejection as the part cools.
After that, the part may shrink slightly for several hours or even days until the temperature and moisture content stabilise.

Name of the polymer Explicit name of the polymer Min Value(%) Max Value(%)
ABS Acrylonitrile-Butadiene Styrene 0.700 1.600
ABS FR Acrylonitrile-butadiene styrene flame retardant 0.300 0.800
ABS High Heat Acrylonitrile-Butadiene Styrene High Heat 0.400 0.900
ABS High Impact Acrylonitrile-Butadiene Styrene High Impact 0.400 0.900
ABS/PC Acrylonitrile-butadiene styrene/Polycarbonate 0.500 0.700
ABS/PC 20% GF Acrylonitrile-butadiene styrene/Polycarbonate 20% glass fibre 0.200 0.300
ABS/PC FR Acrylonitrile-butadiene styrene/Polycarbonate flame retardant 0.300 0.600
Amorphous TPI Blend, Ultra-high heat, Chemical Resistant (High Flow) Amorphous TPI Blend, Ultra-high heat, Chemical Resistant (High Flow) 0.800 1.000
Amorphous TPI Blend, Ultra-high heat, Chemical Resistant (Standard Flow) Amorphous TPI Blend, Ultra-high heat, Chemical Resistant (Standard Flow) 0.800 1.000
Amorphous TPI, High Heat, High Flow, Transparent, Lead-Free Solderable (High Flow) Amorphous TPI, High Heat, High Flow, Transparent, Lead-Free Solderable (High Flow) 1.000 1.200
Amorphous TPI, High Heat, High Flow, Transparent, Lead-Free Solderable (Standard Flow) Amorphous TPI, High Heat, High Flow, Transparent, Lead-Free Solderable (Standard Flow) 1.000 1.200
Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent 0.500 0.700
Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent (Food Contact Approved) Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent (Food Contact Approved) 0.500 0.700
Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent (Mold Release grade) Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent (Mold Release grade) 0.500 0.700
Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent (Powder form) Amorphous TPI, Moderate Heat, Transparent (Powder form) 0.500 0.700
ASA Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate 0.400 0.700
ASA/PC Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate/Polycarbonate 0.300 0.700
ASA/PC FR Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate/Polycarbonate flame retardant 0.400 0.800
ASA/PVC Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate/Polyvinyl Chloride 0.300 0.700
CA – Cellulose Acetate Cellulose Acetate 0.300 1.000
CAB – Cellulose Acetate Butyrate Cellulose Acetate Butyrate 0.200 0.900
Cellulose Diacetate- Pearlescent Films Cellulose Diacetate- Pearlescent Films 1.000 1.500
Celllulose Diacetate-Matt Film Celllulose Diacetate-Matt Film 1.000 1.500
CP – Cellulose Proprionate Cellulose Proprionate 0.100 0.900
CPVC – Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride CPVC – Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride 0.300 0.700
ETFE Ethylene Tetrafluoroethylene 3.000 4.000
EVA Ethylene Vinyl Acetate 0.400 3.500
FEB Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene 3.000 6.000
HDPE – High-Density Polyethylene HDPE – High-Density Polyethylene 1.500 4.000
HIPS – High Impact Polystyrene HIPS – High Impact Polystyrene 0.200 0.800
HIPS FR V0 High Impact Polystyrene flame retardant V0 0.300 0.600
LCP Liquid Crystal Polymer 0.100 0.600
LCP CF Liquid Crystal Polymer carbon fiber 0.100 0.500
LCP GF Liquid Crystal Polymer glass fiber 0.100 0.400
LCP MINERAL Liquid Crystal Polymer mineral 0.100 0.500
LDPE – Low-Density Polyethylene LDPE – Low-Density Polyethylene 2.000 4.000
LLDPE – Linear Low-Density Polyethylene LLDPE – Linear Low-Density Polyethylene 2.000 2.500
MABS Transparent Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene 0.400 0.700
PA 11 30% Glass fibre reinforced Polyamide 11 30% Glass fibre reinforced 0.500 0.500
PA 11 conductive Polyamide 11 conductive 0.700 2.000
PA 11 flexible Polyamide 11 flexible 1.400 1.800
PA 11 rigid Polyamide 11 rigid 0.700 2.000
PA 12 conductive Polyamide 12 conductive 0.700 2.000
PA 12 fiber reinforced Polyamide 12 fiber reinforced 0.700 2.000
PA 12 flexible Polyamide 12 flexible 0.700 2.000
PA 12 glass-filled Polyamide 12 glass filled 0.700 2.000
PA 12 rigid Polyamide 12 rigid 0.700 2.000
PA 46 Polyamide 46 1.500 2.000
PA 46 30% GF Polyamide 46 30% glass fiber 0.300 1.300
PA 6 Polyamide 6 0.500 1.500
PA 6-10 Polyamide 6-10 1.000 1.300
PA 66 Polyamide 6-6 0.700 3.000
PA 66 30% GF Polyamide 6-6 30% glass fiber 0.500 0.500
PA 66 30% mineral filled Polyamide 6-6 30% mineral filled 0.600 1.000
PA 66 IM 15-30% GF Polyamide 6-6 impact modified 15-30% glass fibre 0.200 0.600
PA 66 impact modified Polyamide 6-6 impact modified 1.200 3.000
PAI Polyamide-Imide 0.600 1.000
PAI 30% GF Polyamide-Imide 30% glass fiber 0.100 0.300
PAI low friction Polyamide-Imide low friction 0.100 0.500
PAN Polyacrylonitrile 0.200 0.500
PAR Polyacrylate 0.900 1.200
PARA 30-60% GF Polyacrylamide 30-60% glass fiber 0.100 0.400
PBT Polybutylene Terephthalate 0.500 2.200
PBT 30% GF Polybutylene Terephthalate 30% glass fiber 0.200 1.000
PC 20-40% GF Polycarbonate 20-40% glass fiber 0.100 0.500
PC 20-40% GF FR Polycarbonate 20-40% glass fibre flame retardant 0.100 0.500
PC high heat Polycarbonate high heat 0.700 1.000
PC/PBT Polycarbonate/Polybutylene Terephthalate blend 0.600 1.100
PCTFE Polymonochlorotrifluoroethylene 0.500 1.500
PE 30% GF Polyethylene 30% glass fiber 0.200 0.600
PEEK Polyetheretherketone 1.200 1.500
PEEK 30% CF Polyetheretherketone 30% carbon fiber 0.000 0.500
PEEK 30% GF Polyetheretherketone 30% glass fiber 0.400 0.800
PEI Polyetherimide 0.700 0.800
PEI 30% GF Polyetherimide 30% glass fiber 0.200 0.400
PEI mineral filled Polyetherimide mineral filled 0.500 0.700
PEKK– Low crystallinity grade Polyetherketoneketone– Low crystallinity grade 0.004 0.005
PESU Polyethersulfone 0.600 0.700
PESU 10-30% GF Polyethersulfone 10-30% glass fiber 0.200 0.300
PET Polyethylene Terephthalate 0.200 3.000
PET 30% GF Polyethylene Terephthalate 30% glass fibre 0.200 1.000
PET 30/35% GF Impact modified Polyethylene Terephthalate 30/35% glass fibre impact-modified 0.200 0.900
PET G Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol 0.200 1.000
PE-UHMW Polyethylene -Ultra High Molecular Weight 4.000 4.000
PFA Perfluoroalkoxy 3.000 5.000
PHB – Polyhydroxybutyrate Polyhydroxybutyrate 1.200 1.600
PI Polyimide 0.200 1.200
PLA-injection molding Polylactide-injection molding 0.300 0.500
PMMA Polymethylmethacrylate (Acrylic) 0.200 0.800
PMMA high heat Polymethylmethacrylate (Acrylic) high heat 0.200 0.800
PMMA Impact modified Polymethylmethacrylate (Acrylic) impact-modified 0.200 0.800
PMP Polymethylpentene 1.600 2.100
PMP 30% GF Polymethylpentene 30% glass fiber 0.300 1.200
PMP mineral filled Polymethylpentene mineral filled 1.400 1.700
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Carbon Fiber, Long, 30 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Carbon Fiber, Long, 30 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Carbon Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Carbon Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 60 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 60 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 60 % Filler by Weight Polyamide 66 (Nylon 66)/Glass Fiber, Long, 60 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 30 % Filler by Weight Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 30 % Filler by Weight 0.400 0.400
Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 40 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight Polypropylene Homopolymer (PP Homopolymer)/Glass Fiber, Long, 50 % Filler by Weight 0.300 0.300
POM Polyoxymethylene (acetal) 1.800 2.500
POM impact modified Polyoxymethylene (acetal) impact modified 1.000 2.500
POM low friction Polyoxymethylene (acetal) low friction 1.800 3.000
POM mineral filled Polyoxymethylene (acetal) mineral-filled 1.500 2.000
PP 10-20% GF Polypropylene 10-20% glass fiber 0.300 1.000
PP 10-40% mineral filled Polypropylene 10-40% mineral filled 0.600 1.400
PP 10-40% TALC Polypropylene 10-40% talc 0.900 1.400
PP 30-40% GF Polypropylene 30-40% glass fiber 0.100 1.000
PP copo Polypropylene copolymer 2.000 3.000
PP homo Polypropylene homopolymer 1.000 3.000
PP impact modified Polypropylene impact modified 2.000 3.000
PPA Polyphthalamide 1.500 2.200
PPA – 30% mineral Polyphthalamide– 30% mineral 1.000 1.200
PPA – 33% glass fiber Polyphthalamide – 33% glass fiber 0.500 0.700
PPA – 33% glass fiber – high flow Polyphthalamide– 33% glass fiber – high flow 0.740 0.760
PPA – 45% glass fiber Polyphthalamide– 45% glass fiber 0.100 0.300
PPE Polyphenylene Ether 0.500 0.800
PPE 30% GF Polyphenylene Ether 30% glass fiber 0.100 0.400
PPE FR Polyphenylene Ether flame retardant 0.600 1.000
PPE impact modified Polyphenylene Ether impact-modified 0.600 1.000
PPE mineral filled Polyphenylene Ether mineral filled 0.300 0.700
PPS Polyphenylene Sulfide 0.600 1.400
PPS 20-30% GF Polyphenylene Sulfide 20-30% glass fiber 0.200 0.500
PPS 40% GF Polyphenylene Sulfide 40% glass fiber 0.200 0.500
PPS conductive Polyphenylene Sulfide conductive 0.300 1.000
PPS GF & mineral Polyphenylene Sulfide glass fiber & mineral 0.300 0.700
PS 30 % GF Polystyrene 30% glass fiber 0.200 0.200
PS crystal Polystyrene crystal 0.100 0.700
PS high heat Polystyrene high heat 0.200 0.700
PSU Polysulfone 0.700 0.700
PSU 30% GF Polysulfone 30% glass fiber 0.100 0.600
PSU mineral filled Polysulfone mineral filled 0.400 0.500
PTFE Polytetrafluoroethylene 3.000 6.000
PTFE 25% GF Polytetrafluoroethylene 25% glass fiber 1.800 2.000
PVC 20% GF Polyvinyl Chloride 20% glass fibre 0.100 0.200
PVC plasticised Polyvinyl Chloride plasticised 0.200 4.000
PVC plasticised filled Polyvinyl Chloride plasticised filled 0.800 5.000
PVC rigid Polyvinyl Chloride rigid 0.100 0.600
PVDC Polyvinylidene Chloride 0.500 2.500
PVDF Polyvinylidene Fluoride 2.000 4.000
SAN Styrene Acrylonitrile 0.300 0.700
SAN 20% GF Styrene Acrylonitrile 20% glass fiber 0.100 0.300
SMA Styrene Maleic Anhydride 0.400 0.800
SMA 20% GF Styrene Maleic Anhydride 20% glass fiber 0.200 0.300
SMA FR V0 Styrene Maleic Anhydride flame retardant V0 0.500 0.500
TPS-Injection General Purpose Thermoplastic Starch GP 0.600 1.500
TPS-Injection Water Resistant Thermoplastic Starch WR 0.600 0.900
XLPE – Crosslinked Polyethylene XLPE – Crosslinked Polyethylene 0.700 5.000

plastic mold shrinkage rate

 Cell Culture Plate

The polymer primarily determines the plastic shrinkage rate, but processing conditions and part design also influence the injection moulding process. The ASTM D955 standard, which provides guidelines for determining the linear shrinkage of moulded thermoplastic parts, is commonly used to measure the shrinkage compared to the injection moulding tool.

In addition to ASTM D955, there are other internationally recognised standard methods related to plastic shrinkage. ISO 294-4 is specifically for thermoplastics and outlines the procedure for measuring shrinkage during cooling and solidification. ISO 2577, on the other hand, focuses on thermosets and provides guidelines for measuring shrinkage during the curing process.

These standard methods enable manufacturers to accurately assess and quantify plastic materials’ shrinkage characteristics. This information is essential for designing injection moulds and predicting moulded parts’ final dimensions and tolerances. By understanding the shrinkage behaviour, manufacturers can adjust part designs and processing parameters to achieve the desired dimensions and minimise issues such as warpages or dimensional inaccuracies.

The specific polymer type is crucial, as different materials have varying shrinkage rates. Moreover, factors like mold temperature, cooling rate, and part geometry can also influence shrinkage behaviour. Therefore, carefully considering polymer properties, adherence to standard measurement methods, and optimising processing conditions are vital for achieving precise and consistent results in the injection moulding process.

                                    Plastics Shrinkage Rate
General Plastics Shrinkage Rate (%)
Raw Material Add. 30% GF
LDPE 2.0 0.5
HDPE 2.0 0.4
PP 1.8 0.4
PS 0.6 0.1
PVC 0.4 0.1
PMMA 0.5 0.1
ABS 0.6 0.1
Engineering Plastics        Shrinkage Rate (%)
Raw Material Add. 30% GF
NY6 1.5 0.4
NY66 1.5 0.4
PBT 2.0 0.4
POM 2.5 0.5
PC 0.6 0.1
PPO 0.6 0.1
                                   Mold Shrinkage Rate
Plastics Glass Fiber Adding Mold Shrinkage Rate
[%] [%]
PS 0.3-0.6
HI-PS 0.5-0.6
SAN 0.5-0.7
ABS 0.4-0.7
ASA 0.4-0.6
LDPE 1.5-5.0
HDPE 1.5-3.0
PP 1.0-2.5
PP+GF 30 0.5-1.2
PVC-soft >0.5
PVC-rigid 0.5
PVDF 3.0-6.0
PMMA 0.1-0.8
POM 1.9-2.3
PPO 0.5-0.7
PPO+GF 30 <0.7
CA 0.5
PC 0.8
PC+GF 10~30 0.15-0.55
PBT 1.5-2.5
PBT+GF 30-50 0.3-1.2
PA6 0.5-2.2
PA6+GF 30~50 0.3-1
PA66 0.5-2.2
PA66+GF 30~50 0.5-1.5
PA11 0.5-1.5
PA12 0.5-1.5
PPS 40 0.2

Further Considerations for Plastic Shrinkage

In addition to the factors mentioned earlier, plastic shrinkage in the injection moulding process needs further consideration. These factors can have an impact on shrinkage behaviour and need to be taken into account for accurate predictions and effective part design. Here are some additional considerations:

  1. Additives and Pigments: Certain additives and pigments used in plastic formulations can act as nucleating agents. Nucleating additives promote the formation of small crystals during the cooling and solidification process, which can influence shrinkage behavior. Depending on the specific additive and its concentration, the shrinkage of plastics may be affected, leading to variations in the final dimensions of moulded parts.
  2. Fillers and Fibers in Composite Materials: When plastics are reinforced with fillers (such as glass fibers) or other composite materials, their shrinkage characteristics can differ from those of virgin polymers. Fillers and fibres can affect the material’s thermal expansion coefficients, potentially leading to differences in shrinkage rates. The direction in which the fibres align within the material can also influence shrinkage, as shrinking may occur less in one direction.
  3. Mold Design and Cooling System: The design of the injection mold and the cooling system can impact shrinkage. Non-uniform cooling rates within the mold can result in uneven shrinkage, leading to warpages or dimensional inconsistencies. Proper mold design, including the distribution of cooling channels and optimized cooling times, helps to control the cooling process and minimize shrinkage-related issues.
  4. Processing Conditions: Melt temperature, injection speed, and holding pressure during moulding can affect shrinkage. Optimizing these processing parameters based on the specific polymer used and desired part dimensions is crucial to achieving accurate shrinkage control.
  5. Post-Molding Processes: Some post-molding processes, such as annealing or stress-relieving, can influence the final shrinkage of the plastic parts. These processes minimize residual stresses and optimize dimensional stability by subjecting the parts to controlled heating and cooling cycles.

Considering these additional factors related to plastic shrinkage allows manufacturers to refine their injection moulding processes and ensure more precise control over the dimensional accuracy and quality of the final plastic parts. By understanding and addressing these considerations, manufacturers can reduce shrinkage issues, resulting in high-quality molded components.

There are several well-defined and standardised approaches to determine the shrinkage of plastic parts. The most internationally used and recognised approaches are:

‣ ISO 294-4, ISO 294-3 (thermoplastic shrinkage).
‣ ASTM D955 (thermoplastic shrinkage).
‣ ISO 2577 (thermoset shrinkage).

No comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *